Demographics details for Franklin park, IL vs Danube, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Franklin park, IL vs Danube, MN.

Data Franklin park Danube
Population 18,059 450
Median Age 36.5 years 36.0 years
Median Income $74,167 $57,083
Married Families 36.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 9% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 4.2

Population Comparison: Franklin park vs Danube

  • In Franklin park, the population is higher at 18,059, compared to 450 in Danube.
  • Residents in Franklin park have a higher median age of 36.5 years compared to 36.0 years in Danube.
  • Franklin park has a higher median income of $74,167 compared to $57,083 in Danube.
  • In Danube, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 36.0% in Franklin park.
  • Franklin park has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Danube.
  • The unemployment rate in Franklin park is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.2% in Danube.

Demographics

Demographics Franklin park vs Danube provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Franklin park Danube
Black 1 Data is updating
White 10 95
Asian 5 Data is updating
Hispanic 59 5
Two or More Races 23 Data is updating
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Franklin park vs Danube

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Franklin park at 1% compared to 0% in Danube.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Danube at 95% compared to 10% in Franklin park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Franklin park at 5% compared to 0% in Danube.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Franklin park at 59% compared to 5% in Danube.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Franklin park at 23% compared to 0% in Danube.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Franklin park at 2% compared to 0% in Danube.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Franklin park Danube
Mental Health Not Good 14.2% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 9.9%
Depression 17.7% 23.3%
Smoking 14.4% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 19.6%
Obesity 30.9% 37.8%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Franklin park vs Danube

  • In Danube, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 14.2% in Franklin park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Danube at 23.3% versus 17.7% in Franklin park.
  • Danube has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 14.4% in Franklin park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Danube at 19.6% compared to 18.9% in Franklin park.
  • Danube has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 30.9% in Franklin park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Danube at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Franklin park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Franklin park Danube
No Schooling 2.5% (453) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 17.0% (3,067) 19.3% (87)
Less than High School 30.2% (5,452) 10.4% (47)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.7% (2,297) 5.8% (26)

Education Levels Comparison: Franklin park vs Danube

  • A higher percentage of residents in Franklin park have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Danube.
  • In Danube, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 17.0% in Franklin park.
  • More residents in Franklin park have less than a high school education at 30.2% compared to 10.4% in Danube.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Franklin park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 5.8% in Danube.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.