Demographics details for Frankfort, MI vs Meade, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Frankfort, MI vs Meade, KS.
| Data | Frankfort | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,272 | 3,897 |
| Median Age | 61.1 years | 37.7 years |
| Median Income | $49,219 | $74,063 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Frankfort vs Meade
- The population in Meade is higher at 3,897, compared to 1,272 in Frankfort.
- Residents in Frankfort have a higher median age of 61.1 years compared to 37.7 years in Meade.
- Meade has a higher median income of $74,063, compared to $49,219 in Frankfort.
- In Meade, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 36.0% in Frankfort.
- Frankfort has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Meade.
- The unemployment rate in Frankfort is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.9% in Meade.
Demographics
Demographics Frankfort vs Meade provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Frankfort | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 93 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Frankfort vs Meade
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Frankfort at 4% compared to 1% in Meade.
- Frankfort has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 69% in Meade.
- In Meade, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Frankfort.
- Meade has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 0% in Frankfort.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Meade at 6%, compared to 3% in Frankfort.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Frankfort and Meade at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Frankfort | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 25.6% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 16.8% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 40.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Frankfort vs Meade
- More residents in Frankfort report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.8% in Meade.
- Depression is more prevalent in Frankfort at 25.6% compared to 20.0% in Meade.
- Meade has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 16.8% in Frankfort.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Meade at 18.8% compared to 18.6% in Frankfort.
- Meade has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 33.7% in Frankfort.
- Disability percentages are higher in Frankfort at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Meade.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Frankfort | Meade |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (35) | 0.2% (9) |
| High School Diploma | 19.2% (244) | 13.7% (532) |
| Less than High School | 19.0% (242) | 18.0% (701) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.1% (345) | 15.9% (619) |
Education Levels Comparison: Frankfort vs Meade
- A higher percentage of residents in Frankfort have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.2% in Meade.
- A higher percentage of residents in Frankfort hold a high school diploma at 19.2% compared to 13.7% in Meade.
- More residents in Frankfort have less than a high school education at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Meade.
- A higher percentage of residents in Frankfort hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 15.9% in Meade.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.