Demographics details for Frankfort, MI vs Claremont, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Frankfort, MI vs Claremont, CA.
| Data | Frankfort | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,272 | 36,001 |
| Median Age | 61.1 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $49,219 | $115,091 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Frankfort vs Claremont
- The population in Claremont is higher at 36,001, compared to 1,272 in Frankfort.
- Residents in Frankfort have a higher median age of 61.1 years compared to 41.5 years in Claremont.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $115,091, compared to $49,219 in Frankfort.
- In Claremont, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 36.0% in Frankfort.
- Frankfort has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Claremont.
- Claremont has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.5% in Frankfort.
Demographics
Demographics Frankfort vs Claremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Frankfort | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 6 |
| White | 93 | 37 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 16 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Frankfort vs Claremont
- In Claremont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 4% in Frankfort.
- Frankfort has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 37% in Claremont.
- In Claremont, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 0% in Frankfort.
- Claremont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 0% in Frankfort.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Claremont at 16%, compared to 3% in Frankfort.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Frankfort and Claremont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Frankfort | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 14.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 25.6% | 16.3% |
| Smoking | 16.8% | 8.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.6% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 24.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Frankfort vs Claremont
- More residents in Frankfort report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.0% in Claremont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Frankfort at 25.6% compared to 16.3% in Claremont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Frankfort at 16.8% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Frankfort at 18.6% compared to 16.7% in Claremont.
- Obesity rates are higher in Frankfort at 33.7% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Frankfort at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Claremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Frankfort | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (35) | 1.1% (403) |
| High School Diploma | 19.2% (244) | 6.7% (2,427) |
| Less than High School | 19.0% (242) | 6.2% (2,248) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.1% (345) | 39.5% (14,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Frankfort vs Claremont
- A higher percentage of residents in Frankfort have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 1.1% in Claremont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Frankfort hold a high school diploma at 19.2% compared to 6.7% in Claremont.
- More residents in Frankfort have less than a high school education at 19.0% compared to 6.2% in Claremont.
- In Claremont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 27.1% in Frankfort.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.