Demographics details for Frankfort, KY vs Snover, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Frankfort, KY vs Snover, MI.

Data Frankfort Snover
Population 28,391 260
Median Age 34.2 years 51.5 years
Median Income $53,905 $44,948
Married Families 31.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 12% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Frankfort vs Snover

  • In Frankfort, the population is higher at 28,391, compared to 260 in Snover.
  • The median age in Snover is higher at 51.5 years, compared to 34.2 years in Frankfort.
  • Frankfort has a higher median income of $53,905 compared to $44,948 in Snover.
  • In Snover, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 31.0% in Frankfort.
  • Frankfort has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Snover.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Frankfort and Snover at 4.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Frankfort vs Snover provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Frankfort Snover
Black 12 Data is updating
White 71 97
Asian 3 3
Hispanic 6 Data is updating
Two or More Races 8 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Frankfort vs Snover

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Frankfort at 12% compared to 0% in Snover.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Snover at 97% compared to 71% in Frankfort.
  • Both Frankfort and Snover have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Frankfort at 6% compared to 0% in Snover.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Frankfort at 8% compared to 0% in Snover.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Frankfort and Snover at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Frankfort Snover
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 13.0% 12.8%
Depression 26.4% 26.5%
Smoking 19.4% 22.9%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 17.4%
Obesity 38.6% 35.3%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Frankfort vs Snover

  • In Snover, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.1% in Frankfort.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Snover at 26.5% versus 26.4% in Frankfort.
  • Snover has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 19.4% in Frankfort.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Snover at 17.4% compared to 14.5% in Frankfort.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Frankfort at 38.6% compared to 35.3% in Snover.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Snover at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Frankfort.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Frankfort Snover
No Schooling 0.3% (89) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.3% (4,339) 36.5% (95)
Less than High School 11.5% (3,279) 29.2% (76)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.7% (5,295) 1.9% (5)

Education Levels Comparison: Frankfort vs Snover

  • A higher percentage of residents in Frankfort have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Snover.
  • In Snover, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 36.5% compared to 15.3% in Frankfort.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Snover at 29.2%, compared to 11.5% in Frankfort.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Frankfort hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 1.9% in Snover.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.