Demographics details for Frankfort, KY vs Hickory, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Frankfort, KY vs Hickory, NC.
Data | Frankfort | Hickory |
---|---|---|
Population | 28,391 | 44,084 |
Median Age | 34.2 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $53,905 | $58,251 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Frankfort vs Hickory
- The population in Hickory is higher at 44,084, compared to 28,391 in Frankfort.
- The median age in Hickory is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 34.2 years in Frankfort.
- Hickory has a higher median income of $58,251, compared to $53,905 in Frankfort.
- In Hickory, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Frankfort.
- The poverty level is identical in both Frankfort and Hickory at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Frankfort is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.3% in Hickory.
Demographics
Demographics Frankfort vs Hickory provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Frankfort | Hickory |
---|---|---|
Black | 12 | 13 |
White | 71 | 62 |
Asian | 3 | 4 |
Hispanic | 6 | 13 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Frankfort vs Hickory
- In Hickory, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 12% in Frankfort.
- Frankfort has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 62% in Hickory.
- In Hickory, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Frankfort.
- Hickory has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 6% in Frankfort.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Frankfort at 8% compared to 7% in Hickory.
- In Hickory, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Frankfort.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Frankfort | Hickory |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 12.3% |
Depression | 26.4% | 24.8% |
Smoking | 19.4% | 18.1% |
Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 38.6% | 37.7% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Frankfort vs Hickory
- More residents in Frankfort report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.1% in Hickory.
- Depression is more prevalent in Frankfort at 26.4% compared to 24.8% in Hickory.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Frankfort at 19.4% compared to 18.1% in Hickory.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hickory at 17.2% compared to 14.5% in Frankfort.
- Obesity rates are higher in Frankfort at 38.6% compared to 37.7% in Hickory.
- Disability percentages are higher in Frankfort at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Hickory.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Frankfort | Hickory |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (89) | 0.7% (306) |
High School Diploma | 15.3% (4,339) | 13.1% (5,797) |
Less than High School | 11.5% (3,279) | 11.4% (5,022) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.7% (5,295) | 24.0% (10,580) |
Education Levels Comparison: Frankfort vs Hickory
- In Hickory, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Frankfort.
- A higher percentage of residents in Frankfort hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 13.1% in Hickory.
- More residents in Frankfort have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 11.4% in Hickory.
- In Hickory, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.0% compared to 18.7% in Frankfort.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.