Demographics details for Frankfort, KY vs Greenville, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Frankfort, KY vs Greenville, MS.
| Data | Frankfort | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,391 | 28,017 |
| Median Age | 34.2 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $53,905 | $35,148 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Frankfort vs Greenville
- In Frankfort, the population is higher at 28,391, compared to 28,017 in Greenville.
- The median age in Greenville is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 34.2 years in Frankfort.
- Frankfort has a higher median income of $53,905 compared to $35,148 in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Frankfort at 31.0% compared to 25.0% in Greenville.
- The poverty level is higher in Greenville at 30%, compared to 12% in Frankfort.
- Greenville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.5% in Frankfort.
Demographics
Demographics Frankfort vs Greenville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Frankfort | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 87 |
| White | 71 | 11 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Frankfort vs Greenville
- In Greenville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 87% compared to 12% in Frankfort.
- Frankfort has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 11% in Greenville.
- The Asian population is larger in Frankfort at 3% compared to 1% in Greenville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Frankfort at 6% compared to 0% in Greenville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Frankfort at 8% compared to 1% in Greenville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Frankfort and Greenville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Frankfort | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 16.3% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 19.4% | 26.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 10.6% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 46.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 28.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Frankfort vs Greenville
- In Greenville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.1% in Frankfort.
- Depression is more prevalent in Frankfort at 26.4% compared to 21.2% in Greenville.
- Greenville has a higher smoking rate at 26.7% compared to 19.4% in Frankfort.
- Binge drinking is more common in Frankfort at 14.5% compared to 10.6% in Greenville.
- Greenville has higher obesity rates at 46.0% compared to 38.6% in Frankfort.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Greenville at 28.0% compared to 16.0% in Frankfort.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Frankfort | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (89) | 1.8% (501) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (4,339) | 20.2% (5,661) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (3,279) | 15.5% (4,352) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.7% (5,295) | 14.5% (4,052) |
Education Levels Comparison: Frankfort vs Greenville
- In Greenville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.3% in Frankfort.
- In Greenville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 15.3% in Frankfort.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Greenville at 15.5%, compared to 11.5% in Frankfort.
- A higher percentage of residents in Frankfort hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 14.5% in Greenville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.