Demographics details for Frankfort, KY vs Cody, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Frankfort, KY vs Cody, NE.
| Data | Frankfort | Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,391 | 167 |
| Median Age | 34.2 years | 38.9 years |
| Median Income | $53,905 | $48,750 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Frankfort vs Cody
- In Frankfort, the population is higher at 28,391, compared to 167 in Cody.
- The median age in Cody is higher at 38.9 years, compared to 34.2 years in Frankfort.
- Frankfort has a higher median income of $53,905 compared to $48,750 in Cody.
- In Cody, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 31.0% in Frankfort.
- The poverty level is identical in both Frankfort and Cody at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Frankfort is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.5% in Cody.
Demographics
Demographics Frankfort vs Cody provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Frankfort | Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | Data is updating |
| White | 71 | 88 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Frankfort vs Cody
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Frankfort at 12% compared to 0% in Cody.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cody at 88% compared to 71% in Frankfort.
- The Asian population is larger in Frankfort at 3% compared to 0% in Cody.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Frankfort at 6% compared to 0% in Cody.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Frankfort at 8% compared to 7% in Cody.
- In Cody, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Frankfort.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Frankfort | Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 19.4% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Frankfort vs Cody
- More residents in Frankfort report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 14.4% in Cody.
- Depression is more prevalent in Frankfort at 26.4% compared to 17.6% in Cody.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Frankfort at 19.4% compared to 17.6% in Cody.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cody at 20.4% compared to 14.5% in Frankfort.
- Obesity rates are higher in Frankfort at 38.6% compared to 37.8% in Cody.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cody at 25.0% compared to 16.0% in Frankfort.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Frankfort | Cody |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (89) | 1.2% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (4,339) | 28.1% (47) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (3,279) | 10.8% (18) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.7% (5,295) | 17.4% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Frankfort vs Cody
- In Cody, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Frankfort.
- In Cody, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.1% compared to 15.3% in Frankfort.
- More residents in Frankfort have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 10.8% in Cody.
- A higher percentage of residents in Frankfort hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 17.4% in Cody.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.