Demographics details for Fowler, KS vs Manchester, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fowler, KS vs Manchester, NH.
| Data | Fowler | Manchester |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 513 | 115,141 |
| Median Age | 39.8 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $45,402 | $74,040 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Fowler vs Manchester
- The population in Manchester is higher at 115,141, compared to 513 in Fowler.
- Residents in Fowler have a higher median age of 39.8 years compared to 37.0 years in Manchester.
- Manchester has a higher median income of $74,040, compared to $45,402 in Fowler.
- In Manchester, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 24.0% in Fowler.
- Fowler has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Manchester.
- The unemployment rate in Fowler is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.6% in Manchester.
Demographics
Demographics Fowler vs Manchester provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fowler | Manchester |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 71 | 68 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fowler vs Manchester
- In Manchester, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Fowler.
- Fowler has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 68% in Manchester.
- In Manchester, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Fowler.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fowler at 19% compared to 12% in Manchester.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Manchester at 9%, compared to 7% in Fowler.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fowler at 3% compared to 0% in Manchester.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fowler | Manchester |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.8% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fowler vs Manchester
- More residents in Fowler report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.4% in Manchester.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Manchester at 24.5% versus 21.2% in Fowler.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fowler at 19.7% compared to 17.3% in Manchester.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fowler at 18.8% compared to 14.6% in Manchester.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fowler at 39.3% compared to 35.9% in Manchester.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fowler at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Manchester.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fowler | Manchester |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (1,316) |
| High School Diploma | 9.0% (46) | 17.0% (19,519) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (69) | 15.1% (17,348) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.9% (107) | 23.1% (26,548) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fowler vs Manchester
- In Manchester, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Fowler.
- In Manchester, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Fowler.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Manchester at 15.1%, compared to 13.5% in Fowler.
- In Manchester, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.1% compared to 20.9% in Fowler.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.