Demographics details for Fountain run, KY vs Zanesville, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fountain run, KY vs Zanesville, OH.

Data Fountain run Zanesville
Population 221 24,600
Median Age 49.1 years 38.1 years
Median Income $38,750 $40,927
Married Families 62.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 12% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 6.0

Population Comparison: Fountain run vs Zanesville

  • The population in Zanesville is higher at 24,600, compared to 221 in Fountain run.
  • Residents in Fountain run have a higher median age of 49.1 years compared to 38.1 years in Zanesville.
  • Zanesville has a higher median income of $40,927, compared to $38,750 in Fountain run.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fountain run at 62.0% compared to 25.0% in Zanesville.
  • Fountain run has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Zanesville.
  • Zanesville has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 3.2% in Fountain run.

Demographics

Demographics Fountain run vs Zanesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fountain run Zanesville
Black 1 9
White 99 79
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 3
Two or More Races Data is updating 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fountain run vs Zanesville

  • In Zanesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Fountain run.
  • Fountain run has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 79% in Zanesville.
  • In Zanesville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fountain run.
  • Zanesville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Fountain run.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Zanesville at 8%, compared to 0% in Fountain run.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fountain run and Zanesville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fountain run Zanesville
Mental Health Not Good 22.1% 20.8%
Physical Health Not Good 17.4% 15.5%
Depression 30.6% 26.7%
Smoking 29.1% 25.8%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 16.6%
Obesity 41.1% 47.8%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fountain run vs Zanesville

  • More residents in Fountain run report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 20.8% in Zanesville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fountain run at 30.6% compared to 26.7% in Zanesville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fountain run at 29.1% compared to 25.8% in Zanesville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Zanesville at 16.6% compared to 14.2% in Fountain run.
  • Zanesville has higher obesity rates at 47.8% compared to 41.1% in Fountain run.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fountain run at 24.0% compared to 19.0% in Zanesville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fountain run Zanesville
No Schooling 1.8% (4) 1.6% (389)
High School Diploma 42.1% (93) 26.5% (6,510)
Less than High School 48.9% (108) 17.8% (4,373)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.9% (24) 9.0% (2,214)

Education Levels Comparison: Fountain run vs Zanesville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fountain run have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.6% in Zanesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fountain run hold a high school diploma at 42.1% compared to 26.5% in Zanesville.
  • More residents in Fountain run have less than a high school education at 48.9% compared to 17.8% in Zanesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fountain run hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 9.0% in Zanesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.