Demographics details for Fountain run, KY vs Trumann, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fountain run, KY vs Trumann, AR.
| Data | Fountain run | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 221 | 7,305 |
| Median Age | 49.1 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $38,750 | $37,618 |
| Married Families | 62.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fountain run vs Trumann
- The population in Trumann is higher at 7,305, compared to 221 in Fountain run.
- Residents in Fountain run have a higher median age of 49.1 years compared to 40.0 years in Trumann.
- Fountain run has a higher median income of $38,750 compared to $37,618 in Trumann.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fountain run at 62.0% compared to 35.0% in Trumann.
- The poverty level is higher in Trumann at 13%, compared to 12% in Fountain run.
- Trumann has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Fountain run.
Demographics
Demographics Fountain run vs Trumann provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fountain run | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 99 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fountain run vs Trumann
- In Trumann, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Fountain run.
- Fountain run has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 84% in Trumann.
- Both Fountain run and Trumann have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Trumann has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Fountain run.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Trumann at 8%, compared to 0% in Fountain run.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fountain run and Trumann at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fountain run | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.1% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.4% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 30.6% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 29.1% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 41.1% | 44.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fountain run vs Trumann
- More residents in Fountain run report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 20.8% in Trumann.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fountain run at 30.6% compared to 28.5% in Trumann.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fountain run at 29.1% compared to 25.0% in Trumann.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Trumann at 14.4% compared to 14.2% in Fountain run.
- Trumann has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 41.1% in Fountain run.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Fountain run and Trumann at 24.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fountain run | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (4) | 1.8% (135) |
| High School Diploma | 42.1% (93) | 25.9% (1,895) |
| Less than High School | 48.9% (108) | 24.4% (1,780) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (24) | 6.7% (487) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fountain run vs Trumann
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fountain run and Trumann at 1.8%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fountain run hold a high school diploma at 42.1% compared to 25.9% in Trumann.
- More residents in Fountain run have less than a high school education at 48.9% compared to 24.4% in Trumann.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fountain run hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 6.7% in Trumann.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.