Demographics details for Fountain run, KY vs Mukwonago, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fountain run, KY vs Mukwonago, WI.

Data Fountain run Mukwonago
Population 221 8,446
Median Age 49.1 years 39.7 years
Median Income $38,750 $91,827
Married Families 62.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 12% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.4

Population Comparison: Fountain run vs Mukwonago

  • The population in Mukwonago is higher at 8,446, compared to 221 in Fountain run.
  • Residents in Fountain run have a higher median age of 49.1 years compared to 39.7 years in Mukwonago.
  • Mukwonago has a higher median income of $91,827, compared to $38,750 in Fountain run.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fountain run at 62.0% compared to 44.0% in Mukwonago.
  • Fountain run has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Mukwonago.
  • Mukwonago has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 3.2% in Fountain run.

Demographics

Demographics Fountain run vs Mukwonago provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fountain run Mukwonago
Black 1 Data is updating
White 99 82
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic Data is updating 7
Two or More Races Data is updating 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fountain run vs Mukwonago

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fountain run at 1% compared to 0% in Mukwonago.
  • Fountain run has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 82% in Mukwonago.
  • In Mukwonago, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Fountain run.
  • Mukwonago has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Fountain run.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mukwonago at 7%, compared to 0% in Fountain run.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fountain run and Mukwonago at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fountain run Mukwonago
Mental Health Not Good 22.1% 13.8%
Physical Health Not Good 17.4% 8.6%
Depression 30.6% 21.2%
Smoking 29.1% 13.8%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 25.2%
Obesity 41.1% 35.3%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fountain run vs Mukwonago

  • More residents in Fountain run report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 13.8% in Mukwonago.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fountain run at 30.6% compared to 21.2% in Mukwonago.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fountain run at 29.1% compared to 13.8% in Mukwonago.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mukwonago at 25.2% compared to 14.2% in Fountain run.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fountain run at 41.1% compared to 35.3% in Mukwonago.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fountain run at 24.0% compared to 10.0% in Mukwonago.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fountain run Mukwonago
No Schooling 1.8% (4) 0.6% (48)
High School Diploma 42.1% (93) 17.0% (1,435)
Less than High School 48.9% (108) 4.7% (394)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.9% (24) 25.3% (2,138)

Education Levels Comparison: Fountain run vs Mukwonago

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fountain run have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Mukwonago.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fountain run hold a high school diploma at 42.1% compared to 17.0% in Mukwonago.
  • More residents in Fountain run have less than a high school education at 48.9% compared to 4.7% in Mukwonago.
  • In Mukwonago, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 10.9% in Fountain run.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.