Demographics details for Fountain hills, AZ vs Gardena, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fountain hills, AZ vs Gardena, CA.

Data Fountain hills Gardena
Population 23,785 58,843
Median Age 60.2 years 40.1 years
Median Income $100,317 $75,443
Married Families 58.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 5.7

Population Comparison: Fountain hills vs Gardena

  • The population in Gardena is higher at 58,843, compared to 23,785 in Fountain hills.
  • Residents in Fountain hills have a higher median age of 60.2 years compared to 40.1 years in Gardena.
  • Fountain hills has a higher median income of $100,317 compared to $75,443 in Gardena.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fountain hills at 58.0% compared to 37.0% in Gardena.
  • The poverty level is higher in Gardena at 15%, compared to 0% in Fountain hills.
  • Gardena has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.2% in Fountain hills.

Demographics

Demographics Fountain hills vs Gardena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fountain hills Gardena
Black 2 20
White 89 -5
Asian 2 25
Hispanic 3 44
Two or More Races 4 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fountain hills vs Gardena

  • In Gardena, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 2% in Fountain hills.
  • Fountain hills has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to -5% in Gardena.
  • In Gardena, the Asian population stands at 25%, greater than 2% in Fountain hills.
  • Gardena has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 44%, compared to 3% in Fountain hills.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gardena at 15%, compared to 4% in Fountain hills.
  • In Gardena, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fountain hills.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fountain hills Gardena
Mental Health Not Good 15.1% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 10.9%
Depression 19.7% 13.8%
Smoking 10.7% 11.3%
Binge Drinking 19.8% 13.5%
Obesity 26.5% 28.1%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fountain hills vs Gardena

  • More residents in Fountain hills report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fountain hills at 19.7% compared to 13.8% in Gardena.
  • Gardena has a higher smoking rate at 11.3% compared to 10.7% in Fountain hills.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fountain hills at 19.8% compared to 13.5% in Gardena.
  • Gardena has higher obesity rates at 28.1% compared to 26.5% in Fountain hills.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gardena at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Fountain hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fountain hills Gardena
No Schooling 0.4% (88) 3.0% (1,776)
High School Diploma 11.7% (2,782) 15.0% (8,829)
Less than High School 3.7% (876) 26.5% (15,605)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.2% (10,044) 19.8% (11,669)

Education Levels Comparison: Fountain hills vs Gardena

  • In Gardena, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.4% in Fountain hills.
  • In Gardena, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 11.7% in Fountain hills.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gardena at 26.5%, compared to 3.7% in Fountain hills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fountain hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 19.8% in Gardena.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.