Demographics details for Fountain hills, AZ vs Carlin, NV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fountain hills, AZ vs Carlin, NV.

Data Fountain hills Carlin
Population 23,785 1,950
Median Age 60.2 years 36.3 years
Median Income $100,317 $68,207
Married Families 58.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.2 5.2

Population Comparison: Fountain hills vs Carlin

  • In Fountain hills, the population is higher at 23,785, compared to 1,950 in Carlin.
  • Residents in Fountain hills have a higher median age of 60.2 years compared to 36.3 years in Carlin.
  • Fountain hills has a higher median income of $100,317 compared to $68,207 in Carlin.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fountain hills at 58.0% compared to 52.0% in Carlin.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Fountain hills and Carlin at 0%.
  • Carlin has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.2% in Fountain hills.

Demographics

Demographics Fountain hills vs Carlin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fountain hills Carlin
Black 2 1
White 89 23
Asian 2 7
Hispanic 3 34
Two or More Races 4 32
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Fountain hills vs Carlin

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fountain hills at 2% compared to 1% in Carlin.
  • Fountain hills has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 23% in Carlin.
  • In Carlin, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 2% in Fountain hills.
  • Carlin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 3% in Fountain hills.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carlin at 32%, compared to 4% in Fountain hills.
  • In Carlin, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Fountain hills.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fountain hills Carlin
Mental Health Not Good 15.1% 18.8%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 13.0%
Depression 19.7% 22.3%
Smoking 10.7% 20.0%
Binge Drinking 19.8% 17.6%
Obesity 26.5% 34.7%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fountain hills vs Carlin

  • In Carlin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 15.1% in Fountain hills.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Carlin at 22.3% versus 19.7% in Fountain hills.
  • Carlin has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 10.7% in Fountain hills.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fountain hills at 19.8% compared to 17.6% in Carlin.
  • Carlin has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 26.5% in Fountain hills.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carlin at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Fountain hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fountain hills Carlin
No Schooling 0.4% (88) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 11.7% (2,782) 23.7% (462)
Less than High School 3.7% (876) 11.2% (219)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.2% (10,044) 10.8% (210)

Education Levels Comparison: Fountain hills vs Carlin

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fountain hills have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Carlin.
  • In Carlin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.7% compared to 11.7% in Fountain hills.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carlin at 11.2%, compared to 3.7% in Fountain hills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fountain hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 10.8% in Carlin.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.