Demographics details for Foster, OK vs Plainfield, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Foster, OK vs Plainfield, NJ.
| Data | Foster | Plainfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 247 | 54,513 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 33.1 years |
| Median Income | $68,871 | $70,712 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Foster vs Plainfield
- The population in Plainfield is higher at 54,513, compared to 247 in Foster.
- Residents in Foster have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 33.1 years in Plainfield.
- Plainfield has a higher median income of $70,712, compared to $68,871 in Foster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Foster at 47.0% compared to 29.0% in Plainfield.
- Foster has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Plainfield.
- Plainfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 2.5% in Foster.
Demographics
Demographics Foster vs Plainfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Foster | Plainfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 36 |
| White | 73 | 1 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 52 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 9 |
| American Indian | 7 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Foster vs Plainfield
- In Plainfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 36% compared to 0% in Foster.
- Foster has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 1% in Plainfield.
- In Plainfield, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Foster.
- Plainfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 52%, compared to 0% in Foster.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Foster at 20% compared to 9% in Plainfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Foster at 7% compared to 1% in Plainfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Foster | Plainfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 16.9% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 41.9% | 36.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Foster vs Plainfield
- More residents in Foster report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.9% in Plainfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Foster at 24.7% compared to 16.9% in Plainfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Foster at 21.6% compared to 18.5% in Plainfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Foster at 15.3% compared to 14.3% in Plainfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Foster at 41.9% compared to 36.0% in Plainfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Foster at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Plainfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Foster | Plainfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.5% (1,370) |
| High School Diploma | 30.4% (75) | 16.5% (8,983) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (20) | 28.3% (15,417) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (55) | 14.3% (7,782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Foster vs Plainfield
- In Plainfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Foster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Foster hold a high school diploma at 30.4% compared to 16.5% in Plainfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Plainfield at 28.3%, compared to 8.1% in Foster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Foster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 14.3% in Plainfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.