Demographics details for Foster, OK vs Keyport, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Foster, OK vs Keyport, WA.
| Data | Foster | Keyport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 247 | 284 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 57.0 years |
| Median Income | $68,871 | $128,221 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 58.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Foster vs Keyport
- The population in Keyport is higher at 284, compared to 247 in Foster.
- The median age in Keyport is higher at 57.0 years, compared to 38.8 years in Foster.
- Keyport has a higher median income of $128,221, compared to $68,871 in Foster.
- In Keyport, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 47.0% in Foster.
- Foster has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Keyport.
- Keyport has a higher unemployment rate at 3.0% compared to 2.5% in Foster.
Demographics
Demographics Foster vs Keyport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Foster | Keyport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 73 | 95 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 7 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Foster vs Keyport
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Foster and Keyport at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Keyport at 95% compared to 73% in Foster.
- Both Foster and Keyport have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Keyport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Foster.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Foster at 20% compared to 0% in Keyport.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Foster at 7% compared to 0% in Keyport.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Foster | Keyport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 41.9% | 30.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Foster vs Keyport
- More residents in Foster report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 14.9% in Keyport.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Keyport at 26.4% versus 24.7% in Foster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Foster at 21.6% compared to 11.5% in Keyport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Keyport at 18.9% compared to 15.3% in Foster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Foster at 41.9% compared to 30.8% in Keyport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Keyport at 24.0% compared to 13.0% in Foster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Foster | Keyport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 6.0% (17) |
| High School Diploma | 30.4% (75) | 8.8% (25) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (20) | 12.0% (34) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (55) | 37.3% (106) |
Education Levels Comparison: Foster vs Keyport
- In Keyport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.0% compared to 0.0% in Foster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Foster hold a high school diploma at 30.4% compared to 8.8% in Keyport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Keyport at 12.0%, compared to 8.1% in Foster.
- In Keyport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 22.3% in Foster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.