Demographics details for Foster, OK vs Jackson, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Foster, OK vs Jackson, MO.
| Data | Foster | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 247 | 15,702 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $68,871 | $72,500 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Foster vs Jackson
- The population in Jackson is higher at 15,702, compared to 247 in Foster.
- Residents in Foster have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 35.0 years in Jackson.
- Jackson has a higher median income of $72,500, compared to $68,871 in Foster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Foster at 47.0% compared to 44.0% in Jackson.
- Foster has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Jackson.
- Jackson has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Foster.
Demographics
Demographics Foster vs Jackson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Foster | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 73 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 5 |
| American Indian | 7 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Foster vs Jackson
- In Jackson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Foster.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jackson at 89% compared to 73% in Foster.
- In Jackson, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Foster.
- Jackson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Foster.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Foster at 20% compared to 5% in Jackson.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Foster at 7% compared to 0% in Jackson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Foster | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 41.9% | 36.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Foster vs Jackson
- More residents in Foster report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.9% in Jackson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jackson at 25.5% versus 24.7% in Foster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Foster at 21.6% compared to 17.9% in Jackson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jackson at 19.1% compared to 15.3% in Foster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Foster at 41.9% compared to 36.2% in Jackson.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Foster and Jackson at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Foster | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (72) |
| High School Diploma | 30.4% (75) | 15.4% (2,423) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (20) | 7.8% (1,231) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (55) | 23.8% (3,742) |
Education Levels Comparison: Foster vs Jackson
- In Jackson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Foster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Foster hold a high school diploma at 30.4% compared to 15.4% in Jackson.
- More residents in Foster have less than a high school education at 8.1% compared to 7.8% in Jackson.
- In Jackson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 22.3% in Foster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.