Demographics details for Fort worth, TX vs Pachuta, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort worth, TX vs Pachuta, MS.
| Data | Fort worth | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 956,709 | 199 |
| Median Age | 33.2 years | 53.0 years |
| Median Income | $72,726 | $31,964 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fort worth vs Pachuta
- In Fort worth, the population is higher at 956,709, compared to 199 in Pachuta.
- The median age in Pachuta is higher at 53.0 years, compared to 33.2 years in Fort worth.
- Fort worth has a higher median income of $72,726 compared to $31,964 in Pachuta.
- In Pachuta, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Fort worth.
- The poverty level is higher in Pachuta at 21%, compared to 11% in Fort worth.
- Pachuta has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.7% in Fort worth.
Demographics
Demographics Fort worth vs Pachuta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort worth | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 39 |
| White | 29 | 55 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 34 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort worth vs Pachuta
- In Pachuta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 39% compared to 19% in Fort worth.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pachuta at 55% compared to 29% in Fort worth.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort worth at 5% compared to 0% in Pachuta.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort worth at 34% compared to 0% in Pachuta.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort worth at 12% compared to 6% in Pachuta.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort worth at 1% compared to 0% in Pachuta.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort worth | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 15.4% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 25.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 47.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 36.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort worth vs Pachuta
- In Pachuta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 17.0% in Fort worth.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pachuta at 24.7% versus 22.5% in Fort worth.
- Pachuta has a higher smoking rate at 25.8% compared to 16.7% in Fort worth.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort worth at 16.2% compared to 12.9% in Pachuta.
- Pachuta has higher obesity rates at 47.3% compared to 36.7% in Fort worth.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pachuta at 36.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort worth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort worth | Pachuta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (14,888) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (123,330) | 16.1% (32) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (168,884) | 24.6% (49) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (182,276) | 8.0% (16) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort worth vs Pachuta
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort worth have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Pachuta.
- In Pachuta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 12.9% in Fort worth.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pachuta at 24.6%, compared to 17.7% in Fort worth.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort worth hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 8.0% in Pachuta.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.