Demographics details for Fort worth, TX vs Fresno, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort worth, TX vs Fresno, CA.
| Data | Fort worth | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 956,709 | 545,567 |
| Median Age | 33.2 years | 32.1 years |
| Median Income | $72,726 | $63,001 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 6.6 |
Population Comparison: Fort worth vs Fresno
- In Fort worth, the population is higher at 956,709, compared to 545,567 in Fresno.
- Residents in Fort worth have a higher median age of 33.2 years compared to 32.1 years in Fresno.
- Fort worth has a higher median income of $72,726 compared to $63,001 in Fresno.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort worth at 35.0% compared to 30.0% in Fresno.
- The poverty level is higher in Fresno at 20%, compared to 11% in Fort worth.
- Fresno has a higher unemployment rate at 6.6% compared to 4.7% in Fort worth.
Demographics
Demographics Fort worth vs Fresno provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort worth | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 7 |
| White | 29 | 10 |
| Asian | 5 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 50 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort worth vs Fresno
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort worth at 19% compared to 7% in Fresno.
- Fort worth has a higher percentage of White residents at 29% compared to 10% in Fresno.
- In Fresno, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 5% in Fort worth.
- Fresno has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 34% in Fort worth.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fresno at 18%, compared to 12% in Fort worth.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort worth and Fresno at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort worth | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort worth vs Fresno
- In Fresno, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.0% in Fort worth.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort worth at 22.5% compared to 17.6% in Fresno.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort worth at 16.7% compared to 15.5% in Fresno.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort worth at 16.2% compared to 13.7% in Fresno.
- Fresno has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 36.7% in Fort worth.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fresno at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort worth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort worth | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (14,888) | 2.8% (15,183) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (123,330) | 11.6% (63,519) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (168,884) | 22.1% (120,693) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (182,276) | 14.9% (81,421) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort worth vs Fresno
- In Fresno, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 1.6% in Fort worth.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort worth hold a high school diploma at 12.9% compared to 11.6% in Fresno.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fresno at 22.1%, compared to 17.7% in Fort worth.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort worth hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 14.9% in Fresno.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.