Demographics details for Fort worth, TX vs Camas, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort worth, TX vs Camas, WA.
| Data | Fort worth | Camas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 956,709 | 27,371 |
| Median Age | 33.2 years | 40.3 years |
| Median Income | $72,726 | $133,829 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Fort worth vs Camas
- In Fort worth, the population is higher at 956,709, compared to 27,371 in Camas.
- The median age in Camas is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 33.2 years in Fort worth.
- Camas has a higher median income of $133,829, compared to $72,726 in Fort worth.
- In Camas, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 35.0% in Fort worth.
- Fort worth has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 4% in Camas.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Fort worth and Camas at 4.7%.
Demographics
Demographics Fort worth vs Camas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort worth | Camas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 2 |
| White | 29 | 73 |
| Asian | 5 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort worth vs Camas
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort worth at 19% compared to 2% in Camas.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Camas at 73% compared to 29% in Fort worth.
- In Camas, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 5% in Fort worth.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort worth at 34% compared to 5% in Camas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort worth at 12% compared to 9% in Camas.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort worth and Camas at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort worth | Camas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 9.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 28.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort worth vs Camas
- More residents in Fort worth report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 14.7% in Camas.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Camas at 23.8% versus 22.5% in Fort worth.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort worth at 16.7% compared to 9.9% in Camas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Camas at 19.2% compared to 16.2% in Fort worth.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort worth at 36.7% compared to 28.5% in Camas.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort worth at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Camas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort worth | Camas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (14,888) | 0.4% (110) |
| High School Diploma | 12.9% (123,330) | 9.9% (2,708) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (168,884) | 3.7% (1,021) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (182,276) | 33.5% (9,172) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort worth vs Camas
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort worth have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.4% in Camas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort worth hold a high school diploma at 12.9% compared to 9.9% in Camas.
- More residents in Fort worth have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 3.7% in Camas.
- In Camas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.5% compared to 19.1% in Fort worth.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.