Demographics details for Fort wayne, IN vs Ephrata, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort wayne, IN vs Ephrata, WA.
| Data | Fort wayne | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 267,927 | 8,476 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $58,233 | $57,958 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fort wayne vs Ephrata
- In Fort wayne, the population is higher at 267,927, compared to 8,476 in Ephrata.
- Residents in Fort wayne have a higher median age of 35.1 years compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Fort wayne has a higher median income of $58,233 compared to $57,958 in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort wayne at 34.0% compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- Fort wayne has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- The unemployment rate in Fort wayne is higher at 4.4%, compared to 4.2% in Ephrata.
Demographics
Demographics Fort wayne vs Ephrata provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort wayne | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 1 |
| White | 62 | 63 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 10 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort wayne vs Ephrata
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort wayne at 15% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ephrata at 63% compared to 62% in Fort wayne.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort wayne at 6% compared to 0% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 10% in Fort wayne.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ephrata at 11%, compared to 7% in Fort wayne.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort wayne and Ephrata at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort wayne | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 19.2% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 35.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort wayne vs Ephrata
- In Ephrata, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.1% in Fort wayne.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ephrata at 27.0% versus 23.5% in Fort wayne.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort wayne at 19.2% compared to 17.0% in Ephrata.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ephrata at 17.6% compared to 16.0% in Fort wayne.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort wayne at 39.9% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort wayne at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort wayne | Ephrata |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (4,168) | 0.8% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (42,213) | 17.7% (1,503) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (30,682) | 14.4% (1,223) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.1% (48,562) | 8.0% (677) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort wayne vs Ephrata
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort wayne have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.8% in Ephrata.
- In Ephrata, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 15.8% in Fort wayne.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ephrata at 14.4%, compared to 11.5% in Fort wayne.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort wayne hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.