Demographics details for Fort washington, MD vs Mobridge, SD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort washington, MD vs Mobridge, SD.

Data Fort washington Mobridge
Population 25,825 3,228
Median Age 44.1 years 42.4 years
Median Income $143,623 $54,868
Married Families 43.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 5% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Fort washington vs Mobridge

  • In Fort washington, the population is higher at 25,825, compared to 3,228 in Mobridge.
  • Residents in Fort washington have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 42.4 years in Mobridge.
  • Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623 compared to $54,868 in Mobridge.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort washington at 43.0% compared to 39.0% in Mobridge.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mobridge at 12%, compared to 5% in Fort washington.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Fort washington and Mobridge at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Fort washington vs Mobridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort washington Mobridge
Black 61 3
White 8 71
Asian 8 Data is updating
Hispanic 17 1
Two or More Races 6 9
American Indian Data is updating 16

Demographics Comparison: Fort washington vs Mobridge

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort washington at 61% compared to 3% in Mobridge.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mobridge at 71% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fort washington at 8% compared to 0% in Mobridge.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort washington at 17% compared to 1% in Mobridge.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mobridge at 9%, compared to 6% in Fort washington.
  • In Mobridge, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 16%, compared to 0% in Fort washington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort washington Mobridge
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 7.9% 9.5%
Depression 11.6% 16.9%
Smoking 9.6% 18.0%
Binge Drinking 12.0% 19.9%
Obesity 37.7% 35.8%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort washington vs Mobridge

  • In Mobridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.7% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mobridge at 16.9% versus 11.6% in Fort washington.
  • Mobridge has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mobridge at 19.9% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort washington at 37.7% compared to 35.8% in Mobridge.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mobridge at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort washington Mobridge
No Schooling 1.2% (297) 1.1% (37)
High School Diploma 14.4% (3,710) 18.6% (599)
Less than High School 8.3% (2,138) 6.9% (224)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.8% (8,208) 19.1% (615)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort washington vs Mobridge

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.1% in Mobridge.
  • In Mobridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 14.4% in Fort washington.
  • More residents in Fort washington have less than a high school education at 8.3% compared to 6.9% in Mobridge.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 19.1% in Mobridge.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.