Demographics details for Fort washington, MD vs Leominster, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort washington, MD vs Leominster, MA.

Data Fort washington Leominster
Population 25,825 43,646
Median Age 44.1 years 43.0 years
Median Income $143,623 $75,620
Married Families 43.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 5% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Fort washington vs Leominster

  • The population in Leominster is higher at 43,646, compared to 25,825 in Fort washington.
  • Residents in Fort washington have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 43.0 years in Leominster.
  • Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623 compared to $75,620 in Leominster.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort washington at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Leominster.
  • The poverty level is higher in Leominster at 9%, compared to 5% in Fort washington.
  • Leominster has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Fort washington.

Demographics

Demographics Fort washington vs Leominster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort washington Leominster
Black 61 6
White 8 67
Asian 8 3
Hispanic 17 14
Two or More Races 6 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort washington vs Leominster

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort washington at 61% compared to 6% in Leominster.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Leominster at 67% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fort washington at 8% compared to 3% in Leominster.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort washington at 17% compared to 14% in Leominster.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Leominster at 10%, compared to 6% in Fort washington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort washington and Leominster at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort washington Leominster
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 17.9%
Physical Health Not Good 7.9% 10.6%
Depression 11.6% 23.5%
Smoking 9.6% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 12.0% 16.9%
Obesity 37.7% 32.8%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort washington vs Leominster

  • In Leominster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Leominster at 23.5% versus 11.6% in Fort washington.
  • Leominster has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Leominster at 16.9% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort washington at 37.7% compared to 32.8% in Leominster.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Leominster at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort washington Leominster
No Schooling 1.2% (297) 1.1% (477)
High School Diploma 14.4% (3,710) 18.2% (7,932)
Less than High School 8.3% (2,138) 13.5% (5,889)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.8% (8,208) 24.1% (10,530)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort washington vs Leominster

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.1% in Leominster.
  • In Leominster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 14.4% in Fort washington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Leominster at 13.5%, compared to 8.3% in Fort washington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 24.1% in Leominster.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.