Demographics details for Fort washington, MD vs Ho ho kus, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort washington, MD vs Ho ho kus, NJ.
| Data | Fort washington | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,825 | 4,216 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $143,623 | $250,001 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort washington vs Ho ho kus
- In Fort washington, the population is higher at 25,825, compared to 4,216 in Ho ho kus.
- Residents in Fort washington have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 43.0 years in Ho ho kus.
- Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $143,623 in Fort washington.
- In Ho ho kus, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 43.0% in Fort washington.
- Fort washington has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
- The unemployment rate in Fort washington is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.
Demographics
Demographics Fort washington vs Ho ho kus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort washington | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 61 | 1 |
| White | 8 | 67 |
| Asian | 8 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort washington vs Ho ho kus
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort washington at 61% compared to 1% in Ho ho kus.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ho ho kus at 67% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
- In Ho ho kus, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 8% in Fort washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort washington at 17% compared to 12% in Ho ho kus.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ho ho kus at 8%, compared to 6% in Fort washington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort washington and Ho ho kus at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort washington | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 11.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 5.8% |
| Depression | 11.6% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 6.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.0% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 21.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort washington vs Ho ho kus
- More residents in Fort washington report poor mental health at 12.5% compared to 11.2% in Ho ho kus.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ho ho kus at 16.6% versus 11.6% in Fort washington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort washington at 9.6% compared to 6.9% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ho ho kus at 19.6% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort washington at 37.7% compared to 21.9% in Ho ho kus.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort washington at 9.0% compared to 5.0% in Ho ho kus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort washington | Ho ho kus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (297) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (3,710) | 2.8% (117) |
| Less than High School | 8.3% (2,138) | 2.0% (83) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (8,208) | 51.4% (2,167) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort washington vs Ho ho kus
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Ho ho kus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington hold a high school diploma at 14.4% compared to 2.8% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents in Fort washington have less than a high school education at 8.3% compared to 2.0% in Ho ho kus.
- In Ho ho kus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 31.8% in Fort washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.