Demographics details for Fort washington, MD vs Frankfort, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort washington, MD vs Frankfort, MI.

Data Fort washington Frankfort
Population 25,825 1,272
Median Age 44.1 years 61.1 years
Median Income $143,623 $49,219
Married Families 43.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 5% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Fort washington vs Frankfort

  • In Fort washington, the population is higher at 25,825, compared to 1,272 in Frankfort.
  • The median age in Frankfort is higher at 61.1 years, compared to 44.1 years in Fort washington.
  • Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623 compared to $49,219 in Frankfort.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort washington at 43.0% compared to 36.0% in Frankfort.
  • The poverty level is higher in Frankfort at 10%, compared to 5% in Fort washington.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Fort washington and Frankfort at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Fort washington vs Frankfort provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort washington Frankfort
Black 61 4
White 8 93
Asian 8 Data is updating
Hispanic 17 Data is updating
Two or More Races 6 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort washington vs Frankfort

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort washington at 61% compared to 4% in Frankfort.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Frankfort at 93% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fort washington at 8% compared to 0% in Frankfort.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort washington at 17% compared to 0% in Frankfort.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort washington at 6% compared to 3% in Frankfort.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort washington and Frankfort at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort washington Frankfort
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 7.9% 10.4%
Depression 11.6% 25.6%
Smoking 9.6% 16.8%
Binge Drinking 12.0% 18.6%
Obesity 37.7% 33.7%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort washington vs Frankfort

  • In Frankfort, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Frankfort at 25.6% versus 11.6% in Fort washington.
  • Frankfort has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Frankfort at 18.6% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort washington at 37.7% compared to 33.7% in Frankfort.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Frankfort at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort washington Frankfort
No Schooling 1.2% (297) 2.8% (35)
High School Diploma 14.4% (3,710) 19.2% (244)
Less than High School 8.3% (2,138) 19.0% (242)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.8% (8,208) 27.1% (345)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort washington vs Frankfort

  • In Frankfort, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 1.2% in Fort washington.
  • In Frankfort, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.2% compared to 14.4% in Fort washington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Frankfort at 19.0%, compared to 8.3% in Fort washington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 27.1% in Frankfort.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.