Demographics details for Fort washington, MD vs Elk city, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort washington, MD vs Elk city, KS.

Data Fort washington Elk city
Population 25,825 257
Median Age 44.1 years 45.9 years
Median Income $143,623 $31,250
Married Families 43.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 5% 14%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Fort washington vs Elk city

  • In Fort washington, the population is higher at 25,825, compared to 257 in Elk city.
  • The median age in Elk city is higher at 45.9 years, compared to 44.1 years in Fort washington.
  • Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623 compared to $31,250 in Elk city.
  • In Elk city, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 43.0% in Fort washington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Elk city at 14%, compared to 5% in Fort washington.
  • Elk city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Fort washington.

Demographics

Demographics Fort washington vs Elk city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort washington Elk city
Black 61 Data is updating
White 8 87
Asian 8 Data is updating
Hispanic 17 5
Two or More Races 6 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort washington vs Elk city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort washington at 61% compared to 0% in Elk city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Elk city at 87% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fort washington at 8% compared to 0% in Elk city.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort washington at 17% compared to 5% in Elk city.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Elk city at 8%, compared to 6% in Fort washington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort washington and Elk city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort washington Elk city
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 7.9% 10.9%
Depression 11.6% 22.6%
Smoking 9.6% 19.5%
Binge Drinking 12.0% 19.7%
Obesity 37.7% 41.7%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 28.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort washington vs Elk city

  • In Elk city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Elk city at 22.6% versus 11.6% in Fort washington.
  • Elk city has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Elk city at 19.7% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
  • Elk city has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 37.7% in Fort washington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Elk city at 28.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort washington Elk city
No Schooling 1.2% (297) 0.8% (2)
High School Diploma 14.4% (3,710) 21.8% (56)
Less than High School 8.3% (2,138) 13.6% (35)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.8% (8,208) 3.5% (9)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort washington vs Elk city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Elk city.
  • In Elk city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.8% compared to 14.4% in Fort washington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Elk city at 13.6%, compared to 8.3% in Fort washington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 3.5% in Elk city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.