Demographics details for Fort washington, MD vs Diamond springs, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort washington, MD vs Diamond springs, CA.

Data Fort washington Diamond springs
Population 25,825 12,197
Median Age 44.1 years 43.7 years
Median Income $143,623 $71,279
Married Families 43.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 5% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Fort washington vs Diamond springs

  • In Fort washington, the population is higher at 25,825, compared to 12,197 in Diamond springs.
  • Residents in Fort washington have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 43.7 years in Diamond springs.
  • Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623 compared to $71,279 in Diamond springs.
  • In Diamond springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 43.0% in Fort washington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Diamond springs at 11%, compared to 5% in Fort washington.
  • Diamond springs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Fort washington.

Demographics

Demographics Fort washington vs Diamond springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort washington Diamond springs
Black 61 Data is updating
White 8 72
Asian 8 3
Hispanic 17 18
Two or More Races 6 6
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fort washington vs Diamond springs

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort washington at 61% compared to 0% in Diamond springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Diamond springs at 72% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fort washington at 8% compared to 3% in Diamond springs.
  • Diamond springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 17% in Fort washington.
  • Both Fort washington and Diamond springs have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
  • In Diamond springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort washington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort washington Diamond springs
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 7.9% 10.4%
Depression 11.6% 23.2%
Smoking 9.6% 12.7%
Binge Drinking 12.0% 19.0%
Obesity 37.7% 29.1%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort washington vs Diamond springs

  • In Diamond springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Diamond springs at 23.2% versus 11.6% in Fort washington.
  • Diamond springs has a higher smoking rate at 12.7% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Diamond springs at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort washington at 37.7% compared to 29.1% in Diamond springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Diamond springs at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort washington Diamond springs
No Schooling 1.2% (297) 0.6% (73)
High School Diploma 14.4% (3,710) 17.2% (2,093)
Less than High School 8.3% (2,138) 5.8% (711)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.8% (8,208) 18.6% (2,271)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort washington vs Diamond springs

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Diamond springs.
  • In Diamond springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.2% compared to 14.4% in Fort washington.
  • More residents in Fort washington have less than a high school education at 8.3% compared to 5.8% in Diamond springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 18.6% in Diamond springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.