Demographics details for Fort washington, MD vs Dahlonega, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort washington, MD vs Dahlonega, GA.
| Data | Fort washington | Dahlonega |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,825 | 7,461 |
| Median Age | 44.1 years | 21.8 years |
| Median Income | $143,623 | $57,941 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fort washington vs Dahlonega
- In Fort washington, the population is higher at 25,825, compared to 7,461 in Dahlonega.
- Residents in Fort washington have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 21.8 years in Dahlonega.
- Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623 compared to $57,941 in Dahlonega.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort washington at 43.0% compared to 28.0% in Dahlonega.
- The poverty level is higher in Dahlonega at 12%, compared to 5% in Fort washington.
- The unemployment rate in Fort washington is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Dahlonega.
Demographics
Demographics Fort washington vs Dahlonega provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort washington | Dahlonega |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 61 | 5 |
| White | 8 | 84 |
| Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort washington vs Dahlonega
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort washington at 61% compared to 5% in Dahlonega.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Dahlonega at 84% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort washington at 8% compared to 0% in Dahlonega.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort washington at 17% compared to 6% in Dahlonega.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort washington at 6% compared to 4% in Dahlonega.
- In Dahlonega, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort washington | Dahlonega |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 11.6% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 19.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.0% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort washington vs Dahlonega
- In Dahlonega, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Dahlonega at 23.9% versus 11.6% in Fort washington.
- Dahlonega has a higher smoking rate at 19.4% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Dahlonega at 16.7% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort washington at 37.7% compared to 34.9% in Dahlonega.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Dahlonega at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort washington | Dahlonega |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (297) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (3,710) | 7.5% (556) |
| Less than High School | 8.3% (2,138) | 3.2% (236) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (8,208) | 20.8% (1,554) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort washington vs Dahlonega
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Dahlonega.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington hold a high school diploma at 14.4% compared to 7.5% in Dahlonega.
- More residents in Fort washington have less than a high school education at 8.3% compared to 3.2% in Dahlonega.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 20.8% in Dahlonega.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.