Demographics details for Fort washington, MD vs Bothell, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort washington, MD vs Bothell, WA.

Data Fort washington Bothell
Population 25,825 49,017
Median Age 44.1 years 38.0 years
Median Income $143,623 $127,944
Married Families 43.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 5% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.8

Population Comparison: Fort washington vs Bothell

  • The population in Bothell is higher at 49,017, compared to 25,825 in Fort washington.
  • Residents in Fort washington have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 38.0 years in Bothell.
  • Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623 compared to $127,944 in Bothell.
  • In Bothell, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 43.0% in Fort washington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bothell at 6%, compared to 5% in Fort washington.
  • Bothell has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.5% in Fort washington.

Demographics

Demographics Fort washington vs Bothell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort washington Bothell
Black 61 1
White 8 63
Asian 8 18
Hispanic 17 9
Two or More Races 6 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort washington vs Bothell

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort washington at 61% compared to 1% in Bothell.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Bothell at 63% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
  • In Bothell, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 8% in Fort washington.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort washington at 17% compared to 9% in Bothell.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bothell at 9%, compared to 6% in Fort washington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort washington and Bothell at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort washington Bothell
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 7.9% 8.7%
Depression 11.6% 25.7%
Smoking 9.6% 8.9%
Binge Drinking 12.0% 17.5%
Obesity 37.7% 26.2%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort washington vs Bothell

  • In Bothell, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bothell at 25.7% versus 11.6% in Fort washington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fort washington at 9.6% compared to 8.9% in Bothell.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Bothell at 17.5% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort washington at 37.7% compared to 26.2% in Bothell.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Fort washington and Bothell at 9.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort washington Bothell
No Schooling 1.2% (297) 0.6% (276)
High School Diploma 14.4% (3,710) 6.4% (3,131)
Less than High School 8.3% (2,138) 5.8% (2,838)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.8% (8,208) 39.0% (19,107)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort washington vs Bothell

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Bothell.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington hold a high school diploma at 14.4% compared to 6.4% in Bothell.
  • More residents in Fort washington have less than a high school education at 8.3% compared to 5.8% in Bothell.
  • In Bothell, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.0% compared to 31.8% in Fort washington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.