Demographics details for Fort washington, MD vs Big sandy, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort washington, MD vs Big sandy, TX.
Data | Fort washington | Big sandy |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,825 | 1,286 |
Median Age | 44.1 years | 36.0 years |
Median Income | $143,623 | $41,250 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort washington vs Big sandy
- In Fort washington, the population is higher at 25,825, compared to 1,286 in Big sandy.
- Residents in Fort washington have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 36.0 years in Big sandy.
- Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623 compared to $41,250 in Big sandy.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort washington at 43.0% compared to 36.0% in Big sandy.
- The poverty level is higher in Big sandy at 13%, compared to 5% in Fort washington.
- Big sandy has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Fort washington.
Demographics
Demographics Fort washington vs Big sandy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort washington | Big sandy |
---|---|---|
Black | 61 | 14 |
White | 8 | 69 |
Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 17 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort washington vs Big sandy
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort washington at 61% compared to 14% in Big sandy.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Big sandy at 69% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort washington at 8% compared to 0% in Big sandy.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort washington at 17% compared to 12% in Big sandy.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort washington at 6% compared to 5% in Big sandy.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort washington and Big sandy at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort washington | Big sandy |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.9% | 12.7% |
Depression | 11.6% | 25.4% |
Smoking | 9.6% | 19.8% |
Binge Drinking | 12.0% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 37.7% | 35.9% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort washington vs Big sandy
- In Big sandy, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Big sandy at 25.4% versus 11.6% in Fort washington.
- Big sandy has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Big sandy at 17.9% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort washington at 37.7% compared to 35.9% in Big sandy.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Big sandy at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort washington | Big sandy |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (297) | 0.6% (8) |
High School Diploma | 14.4% (3,710) | 13.8% (178) |
Less than High School | 8.3% (2,138) | 23.4% (301) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 31.8% (8,208) | 11.0% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort washington vs Big sandy
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Big sandy.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington hold a high school diploma at 14.4% compared to 13.8% in Big sandy.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Big sandy at 23.4%, compared to 8.3% in Fort washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 11.0% in Big sandy.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.