Demographics details for Fort valley, GA vs Sugar land, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort valley, GA vs Sugar land, TX.
| Data | Fort valley | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,838 | 109,414 |
| Median Age | 30.6 years | 42.5 years |
| Median Income | $31,807 | $132,247 |
| Married Families | 18.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 25% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Fort valley vs Sugar land
- The population in Sugar land is higher at 109,414, compared to 8,838 in Fort valley.
- The median age in Sugar land is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
- Sugar land has a higher median income of $132,247, compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
- In Sugar land, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 6% in Sugar land.
- The unemployment rate in Fort valley is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Sugar land.
Demographics
Demographics Fort valley vs Sugar land provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort valley | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 7 |
| White | 18 | 33 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 39 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort valley vs Sugar land
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort valley at 70% compared to 7% in Sugar land.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sugar land at 33% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
- In Sugar land, the Asian population stands at 39%, greater than 0% in Fort valley.
- Sugar land has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 8% in Fort valley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sugar land at 8%, compared to 4% in Fort valley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort valley and Sugar land at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort valley | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 7.4% |
| Depression | 19.5% | 16.9% |
| Smoking | 22.3% | 9.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.8% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 46.2% | 25.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort valley vs Sugar land
- More residents in Fort valley report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort valley at 19.5% compared to 16.9% in Sugar land.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort valley at 22.3% compared to 9.6% in Sugar land.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sugar land at 16.0% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort valley at 46.2% compared to 25.0% in Sugar land.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort valley at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Sugar land.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort valley | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (267) | 1.2% (1,314) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (1,226) | 7.3% (7,972) |
| Less than High School | 17.3% (1,527) | 4.3% (4,753) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (954) | 42.8% (46,851) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort valley vs Sugar land
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort valley have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.2% in Sugar land.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort valley hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 7.3% in Sugar land.
- More residents in Fort valley have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 4.3% in Sugar land.
- In Sugar land, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.8% compared to 10.8% in Fort valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.