Demographics details for Fort valley, GA vs Monroe, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort valley, GA vs Monroe, LA.
| Data | Fort valley | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,838 | 46,820 |
| Median Age | 30.6 years | 34.3 years |
| Median Income | $31,807 | $36,550 |
| Married Families | 18.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 25% | 24% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Fort valley vs Monroe
- The population in Monroe is higher at 46,820, compared to 8,838 in Fort valley.
- The median age in Monroe is higher at 34.3 years, compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
- Monroe has a higher median income of $36,550, compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
- In Monroe, the percentage of married families is higher at 23.0%, compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 24% in Monroe.
- Monroe has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 4.5% in Fort valley.
Demographics
Demographics Fort valley vs Monroe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort valley | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 70 | 62 |
| White | 18 | 33 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort valley vs Monroe
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort valley at 70% compared to 62% in Monroe.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Monroe at 33% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
- In Monroe, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Fort valley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort valley at 8% compared to 2% in Monroe.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort valley at 4% compared to 1% in Monroe.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort valley and Monroe at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort valley | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 19.5% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 22.3% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.8% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 46.2% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort valley vs Monroe
- In Monroe, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 19.2% in Fort valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Monroe at 23.8% versus 19.5% in Fort valley.
- Monroe has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 22.3% in Fort valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Monroe at 14.3% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort valley at 46.2% compared to 41.9% in Monroe.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort valley at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Monroe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort valley | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.0% (267) | 0.7% (320) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (1,226) | 16.8% (7,877) |
| Less than High School | 17.3% (1,527) | 10.9% (5,106) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (954) | 17.1% (8,014) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort valley vs Monroe
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort valley have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.7% in Monroe.
- In Monroe, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.8% compared to 13.9% in Fort valley.
- More residents in Fort valley have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 10.9% in Monroe.
- In Monroe, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 10.8% in Fort valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.