Demographics details for Fort valley, GA vs Gotha, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort valley, GA vs Gotha, FL.
Data | Fort valley | Gotha |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,838 | 1,640 |
Median Age | 30.6 years | 28.9 years |
Median Income | $31,807 | $174,750 |
Married Families | 18.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 25% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort valley vs Gotha
- In Fort valley, the population is higher at 8,838, compared to 1,640 in Gotha.
- Residents in Fort valley have a higher median age of 30.6 years compared to 28.9 years in Gotha.
- Gotha has a higher median income of $174,750, compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
- In Gotha, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has a higher poverty level at 25% compared to 4% in Gotha.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Fort valley and Gotha at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Fort valley vs Gotha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort valley | Gotha |
---|---|---|
Black | 70 | 26 |
White | 18 | 40 |
Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
Hispanic | 8 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort valley vs Gotha
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort valley at 70% compared to 26% in Gotha.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gotha at 40% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
- In Gotha, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Fort valley.
- Gotha has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 8% in Fort valley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gotha at 11%, compared to 4% in Fort valley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort valley and Gotha at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort valley | Gotha |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 13.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 8.4% |
Depression | 19.5% | 16.6% |
Smoking | 22.3% | 13.4% |
Binge Drinking | 11.8% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 46.2% | 24.5% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 1.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort valley vs Gotha
- More residents in Fort valley report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 13.7% in Gotha.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort valley at 19.5% compared to 16.6% in Gotha.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort valley at 22.3% compared to 13.4% in Gotha.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gotha at 15.6% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort valley at 46.2% compared to 24.5% in Gotha.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort valley at 16.0% compared to 1.0% in Gotha.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort valley | Gotha |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.0% (267) | 1.5% (25) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (1,226) | 6.2% (102) |
Less than High School | 17.3% (1,527) | 1.5% (25) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.8% (954) | 34.7% (569) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort valley vs Gotha
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort valley have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.5% in Gotha.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort valley hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 6.2% in Gotha.
- More residents in Fort valley have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 1.5% in Gotha.
- In Gotha, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.7% compared to 10.8% in Fort valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.