Demographics details for Fort thomas, KY vs Tappahannock, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort thomas, KY vs Tappahannock, VA.

Data Fort thomas Tappahannock
Population 17,133 2,192
Median Age 37.9 years 48.2 years
Median Income $95,391 $40,703
Married Families 45.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 6% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 3.0

Population Comparison: Fort thomas vs Tappahannock

  • In Fort thomas, the population is higher at 17,133, compared to 2,192 in Tappahannock.
  • The median age in Tappahannock is higher at 48.2 years, compared to 37.9 years in Fort thomas.
  • Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391 compared to $40,703 in Tappahannock.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort thomas at 45.0% compared to 27.0% in Tappahannock.
  • The poverty level is higher in Tappahannock at 12%, compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Fort thomas and Tappahannock at 3.0%.

Demographics

Demographics Fort thomas vs Tappahannock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort thomas Tappahannock
Black 2 42
White 92 51
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 1 2
Two or More Races 4 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Tappahannock

  • In Tappahannock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 2% in Fort thomas.
  • Fort thomas has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 51% in Tappahannock.
  • Both Fort thomas and Tappahannock have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Tappahannock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
  • Both Fort thomas and Tappahannock have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort thomas and Tappahannock at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort thomas Tappahannock
Mental Health Not Good 15.5% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 9.7% 13.1%
Depression 26.2% 22.4%
Smoking 13.6% 20.6%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 14.1%
Obesity 32.4% 44.7%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Tappahannock

  • In Tappahannock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.5% in Fort thomas.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort thomas at 26.2% compared to 22.4% in Tappahannock.
  • Tappahannock has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort thomas at 17.1% compared to 14.1% in Tappahannock.
  • Tappahannock has higher obesity rates at 44.7% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tappahannock at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort thomas Tappahannock
No Schooling 0.4% (66) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 10.7% (1,840) 18.8% (411)
Less than High School 3.3% (569) 8.4% (185)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 37.3% (6,383) 14.1% (309)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort thomas vs Tappahannock

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Tappahannock.
  • In Tappahannock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tappahannock at 8.4%, compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 14.1% in Tappahannock.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.