Demographics details for Fort thomas, KY vs Swainsboro, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort thomas, KY vs Swainsboro, GA.
Data | Fort thomas | Swainsboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,133 | 7,583 |
Median Age | 37.9 years | 30.1 years |
Median Income | $95,391 | $44,491 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 24% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fort thomas vs Swainsboro
- In Fort thomas, the population is higher at 17,133, compared to 7,583 in Swainsboro.
- Residents in Fort thomas have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 30.1 years in Swainsboro.
- Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391 compared to $44,491 in Swainsboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort thomas at 45.0% compared to 25.0% in Swainsboro.
- The poverty level is higher in Swainsboro at 24%, compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
- Swainsboro has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.
Demographics
Demographics Fort thomas vs Swainsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort thomas | Swainsboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 57 |
White | 92 | 33 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Swainsboro
- In Swainsboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 57% compared to 2% in Fort thomas.
- Fort thomas has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 33% in Swainsboro.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort thomas at 1% compared to 0% in Swainsboro.
- Swainsboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Swainsboro at 6%, compared to 4% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort thomas and Swainsboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort thomas | Swainsboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 14.6% |
Depression | 26.2% | 20.6% |
Smoking | 13.6% | 22.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 13.6% |
Obesity | 32.4% | 42.6% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Swainsboro
- In Swainsboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.5% in Fort thomas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort thomas at 26.2% compared to 20.6% in Swainsboro.
- Swainsboro has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort thomas at 17.1% compared to 13.6% in Swainsboro.
- Swainsboro has higher obesity rates at 42.6% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Swainsboro at 24.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort thomas | Swainsboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (66) | 1.9% (147) |
High School Diploma | 10.7% (1,840) | 16.7% (1,264) |
Less than High School | 3.3% (569) | 11.6% (879) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.3% (6,383) | 6.6% (500) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort thomas vs Swainsboro
- In Swainsboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.4% in Fort thomas.
- In Swainsboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Swainsboro at 11.6%, compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 6.6% in Swainsboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.