Demographics details for Fort thomas, KY vs Stockholm, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort thomas, KY vs Stockholm, WI.
Data | Fort thomas | Stockholm |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,133 | 82 |
Median Age | 37.9 years | 69.8 years |
Median Income | $95,391 | $62,500 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 84.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort thomas vs Stockholm
- In Fort thomas, the population is higher at 17,133, compared to 82 in Stockholm.
- The median age in Stockholm is higher at 69.8 years, compared to 37.9 years in Fort thomas.
- Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391 compared to $62,500 in Stockholm.
- In Stockholm, the percentage of married families is higher at 84.0%, compared to 45.0% in Fort thomas.
- Fort thomas has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- The unemployment rate in Fort thomas is higher at 3.0%, compared to 2.5% in Stockholm.
Demographics
Demographics Fort thomas vs Stockholm provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort thomas | Stockholm |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | Data is updating |
White | 92 | 100 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 4 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Stockholm
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort thomas at 2% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stockholm at 100% compared to 92% in Fort thomas.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort thomas at 1% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort thomas at 1% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort thomas at 4% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort thomas and Stockholm at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort thomas | Stockholm |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 11.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 12.6% |
Depression | 26.2% | 20.6% |
Smoking | 13.6% | 16.4% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 19.3% |
Obesity | 32.4% | 38.6% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Stockholm
- More residents in Fort thomas report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 11.8% in Stockholm.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort thomas at 26.2% compared to 20.6% in Stockholm.
- Stockholm has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Stockholm at 19.3% compared to 17.1% in Fort thomas.
- Stockholm has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stockholm at 26.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort thomas | Stockholm |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (66) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 10.7% (1,840) | 28.0% (23) |
Less than High School | 3.3% (569) | 2.4% (2) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.3% (6,383) | 64.6% (53) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort thomas vs Stockholm
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Stockholm.
- In Stockholm, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.0% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
- More residents in Fort thomas have less than a high school education at 3.3% compared to 2.4% in Stockholm.
- In Stockholm, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 64.6% compared to 37.3% in Fort thomas.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.