Demographics details for Fort thomas, KY vs Shafter, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort thomas, KY vs Shafter, CA.
| Data | Fort thomas | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,133 | 21,282 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 27.4 years |
| Median Income | $95,391 | $66,418 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Fort thomas vs Shafter
- The population in Shafter is higher at 21,282, compared to 17,133 in Fort thomas.
- Residents in Fort thomas have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 27.4 years in Shafter.
- Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391 compared to $66,418 in Shafter.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort thomas at 45.0% compared to 31.0% in Shafter.
- The poverty level is higher in Shafter at 20%, compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
- Shafter has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.
Demographics
Demographics Fort thomas vs Shafter provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort thomas | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 92 | -9 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 78 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 27 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Shafter
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fort thomas and Shafter at 2%.
- Fort thomas has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to -9% in Shafter.
- Both Fort thomas and Shafter have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Shafter has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 78%, compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shafter at 27%, compared to 4% in Fort thomas.
- In Shafter, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort thomas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort thomas | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 13.6% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 15.5% in Fort thomas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort thomas at 26.2% compared to 19.7% in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort thomas at 17.1% compared to 14.9% in Shafter.
- Shafter has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort thomas at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Shafter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort thomas | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (66) | 2.7% (567) |
| High School Diploma | 10.7% (1,840) | 14.1% (2,992) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (569) | 32.9% (6,999) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.3% (6,383) | 5.7% (1,217) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort thomas vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.4% in Fort thomas.
- In Shafter, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.1% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shafter at 32.9%, compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 5.7% in Shafter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.