Demographics details for Fort thomas, KY vs San gabriel, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort thomas, KY vs San gabriel, CA.
Data | Fort thomas | San gabriel |
---|---|---|
Population | 17,133 | 38,140 |
Median Age | 37.9 years | 44.3 years |
Median Income | $95,391 | $84,056 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Fort thomas vs San gabriel
- The population in San gabriel is higher at 38,140, compared to 17,133 in Fort thomas.
- The median age in San gabriel is higher at 44.3 years, compared to 37.9 years in Fort thomas.
- Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391 compared to $84,056 in San gabriel.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort thomas at 45.0% compared to 43.0% in San gabriel.
- The poverty level is higher in San gabriel at 9%, compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
- San gabriel has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.
Demographics
Demographics Fort thomas vs San gabriel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort thomas | San gabriel |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 92 | 2 |
Asian | 1 | 61 |
Hispanic | 1 | 27 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort thomas vs San gabriel
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort thomas at 2% compared to 1% in San gabriel.
- Fort thomas has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 2% in San gabriel.
- In San gabriel, the Asian population stands at 61%, greater than 1% in Fort thomas.
- San gabriel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San gabriel at 9%, compared to 4% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort thomas and San gabriel at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort thomas | San gabriel |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 13.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 9.9% |
Depression | 26.2% | 11.9% |
Smoking | 13.6% | 11.0% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 11.2% |
Obesity | 32.4% | 20.4% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort thomas vs San gabriel
- More residents in Fort thomas report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 13.5% in San gabriel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort thomas at 26.2% compared to 11.9% in San gabriel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort thomas at 13.6% compared to 11.0% in San gabriel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort thomas at 17.1% compared to 11.2% in San gabriel.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort thomas at 32.4% compared to 20.4% in San gabriel.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort thomas at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in San gabriel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort thomas | San gabriel |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (66) | 7.6% (2,889) |
High School Diploma | 10.7% (1,840) | 16.2% (6,193) |
Less than High School | 3.3% (569) | 21.7% (8,295) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.3% (6,383) | 26.8% (10,230) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort thomas vs San gabriel
- In San gabriel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 7.6% compared to 0.4% in Fort thomas.
- In San gabriel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San gabriel at 21.7%, compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 26.8% in San gabriel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.