Demographics details for Fort thomas, KY vs Richland, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort thomas, KY vs Richland, MS.
| Data | Fort thomas | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,133 | 7,297 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $95,391 | $54,753 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fort thomas vs Richland
- In Fort thomas, the population is higher at 17,133, compared to 7,297 in Richland.
- Residents in Fort thomas have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 37.1 years in Richland.
- Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391 compared to $54,753 in Richland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort thomas at 45.0% compared to 40.0% in Richland.
- The poverty level is higher in Richland at 12%, compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
- Richland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.
Demographics
Demographics Fort thomas vs Richland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort thomas | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 19 |
| White | 92 | 74 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Richland
- In Richland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 2% in Fort thomas.
- Fort thomas has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 74% in Richland.
- In Richland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Fort thomas.
- Richland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort thomas at 4% compared to 2% in Richland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort thomas and Richland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort thomas | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 13.6% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Richland
- In Richland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.5% in Fort thomas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort thomas at 26.2% compared to 23.4% in Richland.
- Richland has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort thomas at 17.1% compared to 14.2% in Richland.
- Richland has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Richland at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort thomas | Richland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (66) | 1.7% (122) |
| High School Diploma | 10.7% (1,840) | 12.6% (916) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (569) | 10.0% (732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.3% (6,383) | 16.1% (1,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort thomas vs Richland
- In Richland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Fort thomas.
- In Richland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.6% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Richland at 10.0%, compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 16.1% in Richland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.