Demographics details for Fort thomas, KY vs Overland park, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort thomas, KY vs Overland park, KS.

Data Fort thomas Overland park
Population 17,133 197,726
Median Age 37.9 years 38.4 years
Median Income $95,391 $100,876
Married Families 45.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 6% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 3.3

Population Comparison: Fort thomas vs Overland park

  • The population in Overland park is higher at 197,726, compared to 17,133 in Fort thomas.
  • The median age in Overland park is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 37.9 years in Fort thomas.
  • Overland park has a higher median income of $100,876, compared to $95,391 in Fort thomas.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort thomas at 45.0% compared to 44.0% in Overland park.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Fort thomas and Overland park at 6%.
  • Overland park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.

Demographics

Demographics Fort thomas vs Overland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort thomas Overland park
Black 2 5
White 92 74
Asian 1 9
Hispanic 1 7
Two or More Races 4 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Overland park

  • In Overland park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Fort thomas.
  • Fort thomas has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 74% in Overland park.
  • In Overland park, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Fort thomas.
  • Overland park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Overland park at 5%, compared to 4% in Fort thomas.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort thomas and Overland park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort thomas Overland park
Mental Health Not Good 15.5% 12.2%
Physical Health Not Good 9.7% 6.9%
Depression 26.2% 18.3%
Smoking 13.6% 9.6%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 19.7%
Obesity 32.4% 28.6%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Overland park

  • More residents in Fort thomas report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 12.2% in Overland park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort thomas at 26.2% compared to 18.3% in Overland park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fort thomas at 13.6% compared to 9.6% in Overland park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Overland park at 19.7% compared to 17.1% in Fort thomas.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort thomas at 32.4% compared to 28.6% in Overland park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fort thomas at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Overland park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort thomas Overland park
No Schooling 0.4% (66) 0.5% (897)
High School Diploma 10.7% (1,840) 7.1% (13,953)
Less than High School 3.3% (569) 3.3% (6,590)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 37.3% (6,383) 43.1% (85,152)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort thomas vs Overland park

  • In Overland park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Fort thomas.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas hold a high school diploma at 10.7% compared to 7.1% in Overland park.
  • Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 3.3%.
  • In Overland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.1% compared to 37.3% in Fort thomas.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.