Demographics details for Fort thomas, KY vs Ostrander, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort thomas, KY vs Ostrander, MN.
| Data | Fort thomas | Ostrander |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,133 | 227 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $95,391 | $69,583 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort thomas vs Ostrander
- In Fort thomas, the population is higher at 17,133, compared to 227 in Ostrander.
- Residents in Fort thomas have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 37.8 years in Ostrander.
- Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391 compared to $69,583 in Ostrander.
- In Ostrander, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 45.0% in Fort thomas.
- Fort thomas has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Ostrander.
- The unemployment rate in Fort thomas is higher at 3.0%, compared to 2.5% in Ostrander.
Demographics
Demographics Fort thomas vs Ostrander provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort thomas | Ostrander |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 92 | 92 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Ostrander
- In Ostrander, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Fort thomas and Ostrander at 92%.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort thomas at 1% compared to 0% in Ostrander.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort thomas at 1% compared to 0% in Ostrander.
- Both Fort thomas and Ostrander have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- In Ostrander, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort thomas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort thomas | Ostrander |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 13.6% | 19.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 20.8% |
| Obesity | 32.4% | 34.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Ostrander
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Fort thomas and Ostrander at 15.5%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort thomas at 26.2% compared to 23.3% in Ostrander.
- Ostrander has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ostrander at 20.8% compared to 17.1% in Fort thomas.
- Ostrander has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ostrander at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort thomas | Ostrander |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (66) | 0.9% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 10.7% (1,840) | 33.5% (76) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (569) | 17.6% (40) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.3% (6,383) | 17.2% (39) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort thomas vs Ostrander
- In Ostrander, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Fort thomas.
- In Ostrander, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.5% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ostrander at 17.6%, compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 17.2% in Ostrander.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.