Demographics details for Fort thomas, KY vs Maple falls, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort thomas, KY vs Maple falls, WA.

Data Fort thomas Maple falls
Population 17,133 231
Median Age 37.9 years 61.4 years
Median Income $95,391 $32,226
Married Families 45.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level 6% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.0 Data is updating

Population Comparison: Fort thomas vs Maple falls

  • In Fort thomas, the population is higher at 17,133, compared to 231 in Maple falls.
  • The median age in Maple falls is higher at 61.4 years, compared to 37.9 years in Fort thomas.
  • Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391 compared to $32,226 in Maple falls.
  • In Maple falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 45.0% in Fort thomas.
  • Fort thomas has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Maple falls.
  • The unemployment rate in Fort thomas is higher at 3.0%, compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.

Demographics

Demographics Fort thomas vs Maple falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort thomas Maple falls
Black 2 Data is updating
White 92 94
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 1 6
Two or More Races 4 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Maple falls

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort thomas at 2% compared to 0% in Maple falls.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Maple falls at 94% compared to 92% in Fort thomas.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fort thomas at 1% compared to 0% in Maple falls.
  • Maple falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort thomas at 4% compared to 0% in Maple falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort thomas and Maple falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort thomas Maple falls
Mental Health Not Good 15.5% 19.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.7% 13.3%
Depression 26.2% 31.8%
Smoking 13.6% 19.6%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 17.9%
Obesity 32.4% 28.1%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 68.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Maple falls

  • In Maple falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.5% in Fort thomas.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Maple falls at 31.8% versus 26.2% in Fort thomas.
  • Maple falls has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Maple falls at 17.9% compared to 17.1% in Fort thomas.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort thomas at 32.4% compared to 28.1% in Maple falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Maple falls at 68.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort thomas Maple falls
No Schooling 0.4% (66) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 10.7% (1,840) 40.7% (94)
Less than High School 3.3% (569) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 37.3% (6,383) 8.7% (20)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort thomas vs Maple falls

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.
  • In Maple falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 40.7% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
  • More residents in Fort thomas have less than a high school education at 3.3% compared to 0.0% in Maple falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 8.7% in Maple falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.