Demographics details for Fort thomas, KY vs Madisonville, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort thomas, KY vs Madisonville, TX.

Data Fort thomas Madisonville
Population 17,133 4,564
Median Age 37.9 years 38.2 years
Median Income $95,391 $62,135
Married Families 45.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 6% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 4.5

Population Comparison: Fort thomas vs Madisonville

  • In Fort thomas, the population is higher at 17,133, compared to 4,564 in Madisonville.
  • The median age in Madisonville is higher at 38.2 years, compared to 37.9 years in Fort thomas.
  • Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391 compared to $62,135 in Madisonville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort thomas at 45.0% compared to 34.0% in Madisonville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Madisonville at 15%, compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
  • Madisonville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.

Demographics

Demographics Fort thomas vs Madisonville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort thomas Madisonville
Black 2 23
White 92 31
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 1 36
Two or More Races 4 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Madisonville

  • In Madisonville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 2% in Fort thomas.
  • Fort thomas has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 31% in Madisonville.
  • Both Fort thomas and Madisonville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Madisonville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Madisonville at 9%, compared to 4% in Fort thomas.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort thomas and Madisonville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort thomas Madisonville
Mental Health Not Good 15.5% 18.1%
Physical Health Not Good 9.7% 13.1%
Depression 26.2% 22.7%
Smoking 13.6% 18.8%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 16.7%
Obesity 32.4% 39.6%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Madisonville

  • In Madisonville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.5% in Fort thomas.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort thomas at 26.2% compared to 22.7% in Madisonville.
  • Madisonville has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort thomas at 17.1% compared to 16.7% in Madisonville.
  • Madisonville has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Madisonville at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort thomas Madisonville
No Schooling 0.4% (66) 2.3% (106)
High School Diploma 10.7% (1,840) 13.4% (610)
Less than High School 3.3% (569) 37.0% (1,690)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 37.3% (6,383) 8.6% (394)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort thomas vs Madisonville

  • In Madisonville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.4% in Fort thomas.
  • In Madisonville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.4% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Madisonville at 37.0%, compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 8.6% in Madisonville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.