Demographics details for Fort thomas, KY vs Loves park, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort thomas, KY vs Loves park, IL.

Data Fort thomas Loves park
Population 17,133 23,365
Median Age 37.9 years 36.6 years
Median Income $95,391 $56,370
Married Families 45.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 6% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 3.6

Population Comparison: Fort thomas vs Loves park

  • The population in Loves park is higher at 23,365, compared to 17,133 in Fort thomas.
  • Residents in Fort thomas have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
  • Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391 compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort thomas at 45.0% compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
  • The poverty level is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
  • Loves park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.

Demographics

Demographics Fort thomas vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort thomas Loves park
Black 2 7
White 92 71
Asian 1 3
Hispanic 1 10
Two or More Races 4 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Loves park

  • In Loves park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 2% in Fort thomas.
  • Fort thomas has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 71% in Loves park.
  • In Loves park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Fort thomas.
  • Loves park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 4% in Fort thomas.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort thomas and Loves park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort thomas Loves park
Mental Health Not Good 15.5% 16.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.7% 11.3%
Depression 26.2% 21.3%
Smoking 13.6% 17.0%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 17.0%
Obesity 32.4% 39.4%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Loves park

  • In Loves park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.5% in Fort thomas.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort thomas at 26.2% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
  • Loves park has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort thomas at 17.1% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
  • Loves park has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort thomas Loves park
No Schooling 0.4% (66) 0.4% (97)
High School Diploma 10.7% (1,840) 17.1% (3,994)
Less than High School 3.3% (569) 9.7% (2,262)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 37.3% (6,383) 17.4% (4,064)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort thomas vs Loves park

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fort thomas and Loves park at 0.4%.
  • In Loves park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Loves park at 9.7%, compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.