Demographics details for Fort thomas, KY vs Farmington, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort thomas, KY vs Farmington, WV.

Data Fort thomas Farmington
Population 17,133 397
Median Age 37.9 years 37.1 years
Median Income $95,391 $54,750
Married Families 45.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 6% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 5.0

Population Comparison: Fort thomas vs Farmington

  • In Fort thomas, the population is higher at 17,133, compared to 397 in Farmington.
  • Residents in Fort thomas have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 37.1 years in Farmington.
  • Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391 compared to $54,750 in Farmington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort thomas at 45.0% compared to 44.0% in Farmington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Farmington at 10%, compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
  • Farmington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.

Demographics

Demographics Fort thomas vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort thomas Farmington
Black 2 Data is updating
White 92 100
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 1 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Farmington

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort thomas at 2% compared to 0% in Farmington.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 100% compared to 92% in Fort thomas.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fort thomas at 1% compared to 0% in Farmington.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort thomas at 1% compared to 0% in Farmington.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort thomas at 4% compared to 0% in Farmington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort thomas and Farmington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort thomas Farmington
Mental Health Not Good 15.5% 20.6%
Physical Health Not Good 9.7% 14.8%
Depression 26.2% 28.3%
Smoking 13.6% 24.2%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 14.9%
Obesity 32.4% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort thomas vs Farmington

  • In Farmington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.6% compared to 15.5% in Fort thomas.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Farmington at 28.3% versus 26.2% in Fort thomas.
  • Farmington has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort thomas at 17.1% compared to 14.9% in Farmington.
  • Farmington has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Farmington at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort thomas Farmington
No Schooling 0.4% (66) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 10.7% (1,840) 31.5% (125)
Less than High School 3.3% (569) 8.1% (32)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 37.3% (6,383) 9.8% (39)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort thomas vs Farmington

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Farmington.
  • In Farmington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.5% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Farmington at 8.1%, compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort thomas hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 9.8% in Farmington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.