Demographics details for Fort smith, AR vs South haven, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort smith, AR vs South haven, MI.
| Data | Fort smith | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 89,992 | 3,988 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 61.0 years |
| Median Income | $50,799 | $63,202 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort smith vs South haven
- In Fort smith, the population is higher at 89,992, compared to 3,988 in South haven.
- The median age in South haven is higher at 61.0 years, compared to 36.4 years in Fort smith.
- South haven has a higher median income of $63,202, compared to $50,799 in Fort smith.
- In South haven, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 36.0% in Fort smith.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fort smith and South haven at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Fort smith is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.5% in South haven.
Demographics
Demographics Fort smith vs South haven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort smith | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 11 |
| White | 57 | 74 |
| Asian | 6 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort smith vs South haven
- In South haven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 8% in Fort smith.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South haven at 74% compared to 57% in Fort smith.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort smith at 6% compared to 1% in South haven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort smith at 19% compared to 6% in South haven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort smith at 9% compared to 7% in South haven.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort smith and South haven at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort smith | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 27.8% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort smith vs South haven
- More residents in Fort smith report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort smith at 27.8% compared to 24.3% in South haven.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort smith at 21.8% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in South haven at 18.0% compared to 13.2% in Fort smith.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort smith at 39.5% compared to 35.6% in South haven.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort smith at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in South haven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort smith | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (2,029) | 1.2% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (13,356) | 16.0% (638) |
| Less than High School | 19.8% (17,822) | 11.5% (457) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (14,745) | 32.1% (1,279) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort smith vs South haven
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort smith have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.2% in South haven.
- In South haven, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 14.8% in Fort smith.
- More residents in Fort smith have less than a high school education at 19.8% compared to 11.5% in South haven.
- In South haven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 16.4% in Fort smith.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.