Demographics details for Fort smith, AR vs Seaside, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort smith, AR vs Seaside, CA.
| Data | Fort smith | Seaside |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 89,992 | 31,478 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 34.0 years |
| Median Income | $50,799 | $80,239 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Fort smith vs Seaside
- In Fort smith, the population is higher at 89,992, compared to 31,478 in Seaside.
- Residents in Fort smith have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 34.0 years in Seaside.
- Seaside has a higher median income of $80,239, compared to $50,799 in Fort smith.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Fort smith and Seaside at 36.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Seaside at 13%, compared to 12% in Fort smith.
- Seaside has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.7% in Fort smith.
Demographics
Demographics Fort smith vs Seaside provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort smith | Seaside |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 6 |
| White | 57 | 24 |
| Asian | 6 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 19 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort smith vs Seaside
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort smith at 8% compared to 6% in Seaside.
- Fort smith has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 24% in Seaside.
- In Seaside, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 6% in Fort smith.
- Seaside has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 19% in Fort smith.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Seaside at 13%, compared to 9% in Fort smith.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort smith at 1% compared to 0% in Seaside.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort smith | Seaside |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 27.8% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 13.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 27.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort smith vs Seaside
- More residents in Fort smith report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 16.5% in Seaside.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort smith at 27.8% compared to 18.8% in Seaside.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort smith at 21.8% compared to 13.4% in Seaside.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Seaside at 15.1% compared to 13.2% in Fort smith.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort smith at 39.5% compared to 27.5% in Seaside.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort smith at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Seaside.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort smith | Seaside |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (2,029) | 1.8% (565) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (13,356) | 12.2% (3,848) |
| Less than High School | 19.8% (17,822) | 22.0% (6,935) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (14,745) | 16.5% (5,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort smith vs Seaside
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort smith have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.8% in Seaside.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort smith hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 12.2% in Seaside.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Seaside at 22.0%, compared to 19.8% in Fort smith.
- In Seaside, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 16.4% in Fort smith.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.