Demographics details for Fort smith, AR vs Hoffman estates, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort smith, AR vs Hoffman estates, IL.

Data Fort smith Hoffman estates
Population 89,992 50,682
Median Age 36.4 years 38.1 years
Median Income $50,799 $107,428
Married Families 36.0% 48.0%
Poverty Level 12% 4%
Unemployment Rate 3.7 5.2

Population Comparison: Fort smith vs Hoffman estates

  • In Fort smith, the population is higher at 89,992, compared to 50,682 in Hoffman estates.
  • The median age in Hoffman estates is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 36.4 years in Fort smith.
  • Hoffman estates has a higher median income of $107,428, compared to $50,799 in Fort smith.
  • In Hoffman estates, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 36.0% in Fort smith.
  • Fort smith has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 4% in Hoffman estates.
  • Hoffman estates has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.7% in Fort smith.

Demographics

Demographics Fort smith vs Hoffman estates provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort smith Hoffman estates
Black 8 6
White 57 43
Asian 6 25
Hispanic 19 18
Two or More Races 9 8
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort smith vs Hoffman estates

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort smith at 8% compared to 6% in Hoffman estates.
  • Fort smith has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 43% in Hoffman estates.
  • In Hoffman estates, the Asian population stands at 25%, greater than 6% in Fort smith.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort smith at 19% compared to 18% in Hoffman estates.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort smith at 9% compared to 8% in Hoffman estates.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort smith at 1% compared to 0% in Hoffman estates.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort smith Hoffman estates
Mental Health Not Good 19.6% 12.0%
Physical Health Not Good 14.7% 8.1%
Depression 27.8% 15.6%
Smoking 21.8% 10.6%
Binge Drinking 13.2% 17.9%
Obesity 39.5% 24.9%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort smith vs Hoffman estates

  • More residents in Fort smith report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 12.0% in Hoffman estates.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort smith at 27.8% compared to 15.6% in Hoffman estates.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fort smith at 21.8% compared to 10.6% in Hoffman estates.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Hoffman estates at 17.9% compared to 13.2% in Fort smith.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort smith at 39.5% compared to 24.9% in Hoffman estates.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fort smith at 20.0% compared to 8.0% in Hoffman estates.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort smith Hoffman estates
No Schooling 2.3% (2,029) 1.0% (512)
High School Diploma 14.8% (13,356) 10.9% (5,509)
Less than High School 19.8% (17,822) 10.3% (5,235)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.4% (14,745) 34.4% (17,439)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort smith vs Hoffman estates

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort smith have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 1.0% in Hoffman estates.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort smith hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 10.9% in Hoffman estates.
  • More residents in Fort smith have less than a high school education at 19.8% compared to 10.3% in Hoffman estates.
  • In Hoffman estates, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 16.4% in Fort smith.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.