Demographics details for Fort smith, AR vs Elizabeth, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort smith, AR vs Elizabeth, NJ.
Data | Fort smith | Elizabeth |
---|---|---|
Population | 89,992 | 134,283 |
Median Age | 36.4 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $50,799 | $59,939 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Fort smith vs Elizabeth
- The population in Elizabeth is higher at 134,283, compared to 89,992 in Fort smith.
- Residents in Fort smith have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 35.7 years in Elizabeth.
- Elizabeth has a higher median income of $59,939, compared to $50,799 in Fort smith.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort smith at 36.0% compared to 30.0% in Elizabeth.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fort smith and Elizabeth at 12%.
- Elizabeth has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 3.7% in Fort smith.
Demographics
Demographics Fort smith vs Elizabeth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort smith | Elizabeth |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 18 |
White | 57 | 11 |
Asian | 6 | 2 |
Hispanic | 19 | 66 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 14 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort smith vs Elizabeth
- In Elizabeth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 8% in Fort smith.
- Fort smith has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 11% in Elizabeth.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort smith at 6% compared to 2% in Elizabeth.
- Elizabeth has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 66%, compared to 19% in Fort smith.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Elizabeth at 14%, compared to 9% in Fort smith.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort smith and Elizabeth at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort smith | Elizabeth |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 14.5% |
Depression | 27.8% | 18.0% |
Smoking | 21.8% | 17.7% |
Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 15.0% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 33.9% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort smith vs Elizabeth
- More residents in Fort smith report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 16.8% in Elizabeth.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort smith at 27.8% compared to 18.0% in Elizabeth.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort smith at 21.8% compared to 17.7% in Elizabeth.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Elizabeth at 15.0% compared to 13.2% in Fort smith.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort smith at 39.5% compared to 33.9% in Elizabeth.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort smith at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Elizabeth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort smith | Elizabeth |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.3% (2,029) | 2.6% (3,513) |
High School Diploma | 14.8% (13,356) | 23.7% (31,770) |
Less than High School | 19.8% (17,822) | 31.8% (42,757) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (14,745) | 9.2% (12,394) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort smith vs Elizabeth
- In Elizabeth, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 2.3% in Fort smith.
- In Elizabeth, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.7% compared to 14.8% in Fort smith.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Elizabeth at 31.8%, compared to 19.8% in Fort smith.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort smith hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 9.2% in Elizabeth.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.