Demographics details for Fort smith, AR vs Bagley, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort smith, AR vs Bagley, IA.
Data | Fort smith | Bagley |
---|---|---|
Population | 89,992 | 229 |
Median Age | 36.4 years | 47.0 years |
Median Income | $50,799 | $43,929 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fort smith vs Bagley
- In Fort smith, the population is higher at 89,992, compared to 229 in Bagley.
- The median age in Bagley is higher at 47.0 years, compared to 36.4 years in Fort smith.
- Fort smith has a higher median income of $50,799 compared to $43,929 in Bagley.
- In Bagley, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 36.0% in Fort smith.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fort smith and Bagley at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Fort smith is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.5% in Bagley.
Demographics
Demographics Fort smith vs Bagley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fort smith | Bagley |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | Data is updating |
White | 57 | 92 |
Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 19 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort smith vs Bagley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort smith at 8% compared to 0% in Bagley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bagley at 92% compared to 57% in Fort smith.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort smith at 6% compared to 0% in Bagley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort smith at 19% compared to 4% in Bagley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort smith at 9% compared to 4% in Bagley.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort smith at 1% compared to 0% in Bagley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fort smith | Bagley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 9.3% |
Depression | 27.8% | 18.1% |
Smoking | 21.8% | 16.6% |
Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 22.3% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 35.7% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort smith vs Bagley
- More residents in Fort smith report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 14.8% in Bagley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort smith at 27.8% compared to 18.1% in Bagley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort smith at 21.8% compared to 16.6% in Bagley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bagley at 22.3% compared to 13.2% in Fort smith.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort smith at 39.5% compared to 35.7% in Bagley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bagley at 25.0% compared to 20.0% in Fort smith.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fort smith | Bagley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.3% (2,029) | 0.9% (2) |
High School Diploma | 14.8% (13,356) | 27.5% (63) |
Less than High School | 19.8% (17,822) | 28.8% (66) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (14,745) | 8.3% (19) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort smith vs Bagley
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort smith have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.9% in Bagley.
- In Bagley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.5% compared to 14.8% in Fort smith.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bagley at 28.8%, compared to 19.8% in Fort smith.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort smith hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 8.3% in Bagley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.