Demographics details for Fort smith, AR vs Averill park, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort smith, AR vs Averill park, NY.

Data Fort smith Averill park
Population 89,992 1,608
Median Age 36.4 years 53.3 years
Median Income $50,799 $109,746
Married Families 36.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 12% 4%
Unemployment Rate 3.7 3.5

Population Comparison: Fort smith vs Averill park

  • In Fort smith, the population is higher at 89,992, compared to 1,608 in Averill park.
  • The median age in Averill park is higher at 53.3 years, compared to 36.4 years in Fort smith.
  • Averill park has a higher median income of $109,746, compared to $50,799 in Fort smith.
  • In Averill park, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 36.0% in Fort smith.
  • Fort smith has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 4% in Averill park.
  • The unemployment rate in Fort smith is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.5% in Averill park.

Demographics

Demographics Fort smith vs Averill park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort smith Averill park
Black 8 Data is updating
White 57 100
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic 19 Data is updating
Two or More Races 9 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort smith vs Averill park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort smith at 8% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Averill park at 100% compared to 57% in Fort smith.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fort smith at 6% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fort smith at 19% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fort smith at 9% compared to 0% in Averill park.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort smith at 1% compared to 0% in Averill park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort smith Averill park
Mental Health Not Good 19.6% 14.6%
Physical Health Not Good 14.7% 9.1%
Depression 27.8% 23.7%
Smoking 21.8% 15.9%
Binge Drinking 13.2% 21.5%
Obesity 39.5% 34.6%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort smith vs Averill park

  • More residents in Fort smith report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 14.6% in Averill park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort smith at 27.8% compared to 23.7% in Averill park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fort smith at 21.8% compared to 15.9% in Averill park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Averill park at 21.5% compared to 13.2% in Fort smith.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort smith at 39.5% compared to 34.6% in Averill park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fort smith at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Averill park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort smith Averill park
No Schooling 2.3% (2,029) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 14.8% (13,356) 22.0% (354)
Less than High School 19.8% (17,822) 3.7% (60)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.4% (14,745) 32.3% (520)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort smith vs Averill park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort smith have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.0% in Averill park.
  • In Averill park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 14.8% in Fort smith.
  • More residents in Fort smith have less than a high school education at 19.8% compared to 3.7% in Averill park.
  • In Averill park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.3% compared to 16.4% in Fort smith.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.